Tuesday, November 27, 2012

A refocused perspective after losing it all

It was the day of Thanksgiving when the national guard agreed to escort me to my family home, and as I looked around at the crumbled remnants of the walls, the brown earth seeping through the water cracked floor, the jagged glass clutching to the window pane, I knew I had never truly realized how much I had to be thankful for.
    Three weeks ago hurricane Sandy swept mercilessly across the East Coast, and it took my town with it. The ocean breached and even crumbled parts of the sea wall, bringing a devastating 15 feet of water into the nearby streets, houses, and businesses. Returning home this weekend, the sight was truly post apocalyptic. All of the stores and restaurants were boarded shut, army and national guard tanks and tents were stationed everywhere, and the streets were littered mountains of garbage sometimes hundreds of feet high.
    The water was unforgiving in its destruction. The foundation of our home deteriorated, and the majority of my family’s belongings were carried out to sea. Everything from our furniture to family photos, things we simply never imagined being forced to part with, had so quickly become one with the earth from which they came. It was an incredible manifestation of Locke’s conceptualization of property in his Second Treatise. While he defends property as an essential right, he makes clear that it is no more than a social contract. Property is not possession, but simply a claim of one’s right to continued and exclusive use of an object. He remains keenly aware of the fact that each and every piece of property was taken, in some capacity, from nature’s provided resources. While we may assert our continued right to use an object over other people, no piece of property can ever be permanently claimed from nature. Just “as [our things] are produced by the spontaneous hand of nature,” the same unpredictable forces can take our property that we so naively thought to be untouchable.


    While our claim to property had never seemed to weak, our sense of human connection never seemed so strong. Neighbors that were previously distant strangers, some even unfriendly, became reliable sources of help and emotional support. It was a touching display of the strength of united human spirit, something that Rousseau advocated in his Discourse on Human Inequality. In Rousseau’s description of the evolution of the civilized man, he illustrates the origin of society through the organization of men into their huts. This structure of cohabitation fostered social interaction between people as people as they got to know their neighbors and built relationships with them. He claims this “nascent society” was the social golden age, as human relationships were soon after spoiled by financial inequality and subsequent jealousy. As Professor Lavaque-Manty stated in class, Rousseau truly believed that society’s biggest problem was this evolution of selfishness. For him, the independence, happiness, and equality of people were far more important than any physical acquisition of goods that we so often focus on. In this rare moment, stripped of their physical possessions, members of our community were violently removed from their own self-absorption. They instead took the time to strengthen the relationships with those around them, finding it hard to believe anything else had ever really mattered.

3 comments:

  1. Mariah,

    I first want to send my regards to you and your family. I am so sorry that this is what you had to go home to for Thanksgiving break. I do feel that you have created a very interesting post. I think you do a great job tying hurricane Sandy to readings in this course, especially Rousseau's "Discourse on Human Inequality." As you stated, Rousseau's description of the civilized man illustrates the origin of society through the organization of men into their huts. This structure allowed for interaction between people, which led to creating relationships. Although hurricane Sandy has caused such havoc for you, it has also enabled your community to interact again, and to build relationships just as Rousseau said. Because your connections seem stronger than they have ever been, before the storm your community may have been in somewhat of a "nascent society." Now that the relationships are able to be built up, you are leaving this nascent society.

    ReplyDelete
  2. First of all I am so sorry. Hurricane Sandy was extremely devastating to a great many, and my prayers and wishes are with your family as well as your community. It is always so hard to hear about instances such as this, and having a first hand account really made your blog post powerful. I found your circumstances compared to Rousseau’s ideas an extremely positive way to look at the situation.

    Though things may seem hard now, the building of the community that is involved in the restoration truly seems like a modern version of a “nascent society” which Rousseau would argue is a positive thing. Take hurricane Katrina. Though Katrina was just a larger version of hurricane Sandy, the nation rallied around the city of New Orleans to help rebuild it and give aid. TV shows such as, Extreme Home Improvement, brought awareness to communities around the nation, and many charities started in order to help give relief. In these kinds of situations Rousseau’s notion of selfishness is lost, and even though these kinds of natural disasters are devastating, they do cause people to think about someone other than himself or herself for a while. I am not involved, nor do I have family in the east effected by the hurricane. However, just hearing about the devastation makes me reevaluate how fortunate I am, and reminds me to be selfless. I’m sure things are extremely tough right now, but Rousseau’s idea that a society where selfishness is not found, or is little, is the best kind of society, causes me to have faith that good things can come out of such disasters.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mariah-
    Thanks for that truly touching story. Having family with similar stories in Ocean City, NJ, I know how much the hurricane devastated the east coast. After reading your article and it’s description of property as it relates to temporary possession, it got me thinking of the value of material belongings in life. As you wrote Locke’s conceptualization of property in his Second Treatise says that “property is no more than a social contract” until you die or give up that property. While your story of losing family photographs is devastating, I think it can serve as a reminder than all property that we accumulate in life is indeed, temporary. We are all familiar with the saying “Money doesn’t buy happiness!” While we all agree that money cannot buy possessions that make us happy, we often disillusion ourselves into thinking that it can. Therefore it takes catastrophes such as losing some of that property to realize that it is only “mine” for the time being. The incorporation of Locke serves as a reminder that just as everything we make claims towards will always be owned by nature, nature can also take away that property in the glimpse of a second, making it no longer a piece of one’s possession. Moments like this can serve as a reminder to value people around you more than possessions, as seen in the love of your neighbors and the temporality of everyone’s possessions.
    Thanks for the read!
    -Brennan

    ReplyDelete